[i2c] [PATCH] i2c-iop3xx: Switch to static adapter numbering
Andrew Morton
akpm at linux-foundation.org
Thu Jun 7 21:57:21 CEST 2007
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:50:20 +0200
Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:44:56 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> [2007-06-06 10:16]:
> > > I don't know what the heck these patches do so I very often *need*
> > > originators to tell me whether they are urgent, and why.
> >
> > They are not urgent at all.
> >
> > > Right now they're sitting in my to-go-to-Jean queue and that's where
> > > they're staying unless I hear otherwise.
> >
> > That's fine.
>
> That's half fine. I can take
> i2c-iop3xx-switch-to-static-adapter-numbering.patch, however
> thecus-n2100-register-rtc-rs5c372-i2c-device.patch is not really an i2c
> patch, it should go to the rtc tree together with the patch which
> converts the rtc-rs5c372 driver to the new i2c model.
>
OK, thanks.
I staged thecus-n2100-register-rtc-rs5c372-i2c-device.patch after
rtc-rs5c372-becomes-a-new-style-i2c-driver.patch in the patching order.
These will hit mainline after the i2c tree has merged, assuming that you
merge in the first week of the merge window - please do so, because I
prefer to wait until the subsystem trees have merged and sometimes time
gets tight.
I shall wait for i2c-iop3xx-switch-to-static-adapter-numbering.patch to
appear in the i2c tree at which stage I'll drop the -mm copy.
More information about the i2c
mailing list