[i2c] [PATCH] Is review of AT91 patch pending?
arasv at magtech.com.au
Fri Oct 19 02:45:32 CEST 2007
Ronny Nilsson wrote:
> Here's an update of my AT91 bus driver with IRQ support. Previously
> the best speed it could handle was in the range of 30-50 kHz, any
> higher and transfer errors began occurring. This has however changed.
> The attached patch can handle 400 kHz, even on a loaded system!
> The patch size ha grown considerably, modifying ten files because
> achieving this kind of speed with the Atmel TWI controller require
> some dirty SW tricks... One effect of this is that the I2C throughput
> will decrease when the cpu has much to do. For example, a basic
> clockrate of 400 kHz might drop towards 100 kHz when the cpu is very
> heavily loaded. The general speed of your cpu, ram and flash will
> also have impact. Default speed is 100 kHz but it can be changed in
> runtime with /sys/devices/platform/at91_i2c/clockrate. If you change
> it, ensure to monitor the syslog for error messages from the TWI
> This patch is a hack! I mean it! It's highly experimental, ugly and
> only tested for Atmel AT91RM9200. Suggestions are most welcome for
> how to make it nicer looking. Testers are wanted too.
> /Ronny Nilsson
One more test. I killed every single background process there was and it still
failed at 100KHz. In a test run of 1000, 4 failed.
Also, I must note that my test procedure uses block reads and I use the i2c-dev
interface. If I just read one byte at a time, the old driver would never fail
but it was extremely slow.
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
More information about the i2c