[i2c] [PATCH] Add a new-style driver for most I2C EEPROMs

[Wolfram Sang]

> drivers, so "i2c-eeprom" would be confusing. "at24" is just fine and I
> see no reason to change the name.  The Linux driver tree is full of
> vendor-specific names, and this has never been a problem.
I just wondered why we should pick one vendor's name altough the driver 
is designed to work for all vendors. Not the biggest question at the 
moment, though ;)

    Wolfram

-- 
   Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
  Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry