[i2c] [PATCH] i2c: Floppy controller bus driver (V0.2)
khali at linux-fr.org
Mon Aug 18 20:57:08 CEST 2008
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:40:53 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:45:39AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:10:46 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > diff -NurpP --minimal linux-2.6.27-rc3/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig linux-2.6.27-rc3-fi2c-v0.2/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> > > --- linux-2.6.27-rc3/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig 2008-08-15 21:19:24.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ linux-2.6.27-rc3-fi2c-v0.2/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig 2008-08-18 03:46:31.000000000 +0200
> > > @@ -490,6 +490,22 @@ config I2C_VERSATILE
> > >
> > > comment "External I2C/SMBus adapter drivers"
> > >
> > > +config I2C_FLOPPY
> > > + tristate "Floppy controller adapter"
> > > + select I2C_ALGOBIT
> > > + default n
> > > + help
> > > + This supports a simple do-it-yourself floppy controller to
> > > + I2C adapters using the motor control lines for SDA and SCL,
> > > + and the drive change input for SDA readback.
> > > +
> > > + This support is also available as a module. If so, the module
> > > + will be called i2c-floppy.
> > > +
> > > + If you do not have such a device, and do not plan to build one,
> > > + it's safe to say N here. Do not say Y here and to the floppy
> > > + driver unless you know exactly what you are doing.
> > Good point. In fact it would be safer to depend on !BLK_DEV_FD. There's
> > no "if you know exactly what you are doing" that holds: if any of these
> > drivers is built in, the other one _must_ be excluded.
> well, actually not true ... I build both drivers
> as module, and can then decide wether I want to
> attach a floppy or an I2C adapter ... and except
> for the fact that floppy access to the I2C adapter
> is not the best idea, this works perfectly fine
What I propose wouldn't prevent you from doing that. "depend
on !BLK_DEV_FD" means that both drivers can't be built-in. Both drivers
as modules is OK. Remember that the Kconfig language is based on
> but as far as I know, there is no (sane) way to
> say building both 'M' is fine, but 'Y' is a nono
> (I think that is why many drivers write it this
> way in the help)
There _is_ a way do to this and that's exactly what I proposed.
> making it mutually exclusive is kind of problematic
> as you need to disable one _beforehand_ to see the
> other in the config ...
This is true, but I don't expect this to be a problem in practice. Most
users have the standard floppy driver built as module, so they will see
i2c-floppy and will be able to build it as a module. Worst case is if
the standard floppy driver is built-in, but I don't expect this to be a
popular choice these days, with all the PCs out there without a floppy
disk drive. If this is really a problem, it's easy to add a message in
Kconfig to tell people what they need to do to get access to
i2c-floppy. But I don't expect your driver to be popular enough to
> magically disabling the
> floppy driver from the i2c-floppy is not an option
> either, as the build system doesn't support that
Agreed. Even if the build system could do that, this would be highly
> so I personally think the 'default n' + warning
> is fine for everyday use, but of course, the final
> call is yours
I'll add the dependency. If I don't, somebody will quickly complain
that floppy support is broken by allyesconfig.
No need to resend, I'll do that in a incremental patch. I think I'll
add a dependency on EXPERIMENTAL as well - after all your driver has
seen little testing so far.
More information about the i2c