[i2c] [PATCH] gpio: max732x: add support for MAX7319, MAX7320-7327 I2C Port Expanders

Jean Delvare khali at linux-fr.org
Sun Jul 13 08:55:54 CEST 2008


On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:42:30 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 12 July 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:46:29 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Saturday 12 July 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > > Why not just insist the 0x5x address be registered/probed?  This
> > > > > extra stuff is needless and confusing.
> > > > 
> > > > Because some of the chips supported by this driver (max7319, max7321,
> > > > max7322 and max7323) only use address 0x6x.
> > > 
> > > That's not the behavior implemented here though ... it's always
> > > creating a dummy, even when it's not needed.
> > 
> > Did you miss this comment of mine maybe?
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-July/004267.html
> 
> Server not responding; can't tell.  Using the MARC.info archive [1]
> what message is that?  Are you disagreeing with what I said?
> 
> [1] http://marc.info/?t=121567059700001&r=1&w=2

http://marc.info/?l=i2c&m=121577504211597&w=2

No, I didn't disagree. In fact you were merely repeating what I had
already written ;) so I wanted you to read my comment so you knew you
didn't have to convince me.

-- 
Jean Delvare



More information about the i2c mailing list