[i2c] [PATCH 1/1] Blackfin I2C Driver: Functional power management support
Hennerich, Michael
Michael.Hennerich at analog.com
Mon Jul 28 14:16:44 CEST 2008
>From: Ben Dooks [mailto:ben-linux at fluff.org]
>
>On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 06:07:28PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux at fluff.org>
wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 02:41:54PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
>> >> From: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich at analog.com>
>> >>
>> >> PM_SUSPEND_MEM: Blackfin does not maintain register state through
>> >> Hibernate. Save and restore peripheral base initialization during
>> >> PM transitions.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich at analog.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney at kernel.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c | 35
++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>-------
>> >> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
>b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
>> >> index 48d084b..3c855ff 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
>> >> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ struct bfin_twi_iface {
>> >> struct i2c_msg *pmsg;
>> >> int msg_num;
>> >> int cur_msg;
>> >> + u16 saved_clkdiv;
>> >> + u16 saved_control;
>> >> void __iomem *regs_base;
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> @@ -565,32 +567,43 @@ static u32 bfin_twi_functionality(struct
>i2c_adapter *adap)
>> >> I2C_FUNC_I2C;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> static struct i2c_algorithm bfin_twi_algorithm = {
>> >> .master_xfer = bfin_twi_master_xfer,
>> >> .smbus_xfer = bfin_twi_smbus_xfer,
>> >> .functionality = bfin_twi_functionality,
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> -static int i2c_bfin_twi_suspend(struct platform_device *dev,
>pm_message_t state)
>> >> +static int i2c_bfin_twi_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
>pm_message_t state)
>> >> {
>> >> - struct bfin_twi_iface *iface = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
>> >> + struct bfin_twi_iface *iface = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> >> +
>> >> + iface->saved_clkdiv = read_CLKDIV(iface);
>> >> + iface->saved_control = read_CONTROL(iface);
>> >> +
>> >> + free_irq(iface->irq, iface);
>> >>
>> >> /* Disable TWI */
>> >> - write_CONTROL(iface, read_CONTROL(iface) & ~TWI_ENA);
>> >> - SSYNC();
>> >> + write_CONTROL(iface, iface->saved_control & ~TWI_ENA);
>> >
>> > I assume removing the SSYNC() call is valid?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, I think it is OK for that. We tested on our platform.
>> Actually, keeping the SSYNC() is not a big deal for this driver.
>> How do you think Michael?
>>
>> >> return 0;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -static int i2c_bfin_twi_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
>> >> +static int i2c_bfin_twi_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >> {
>> >> - struct bfin_twi_iface *iface = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
>> >> + struct bfin_twi_iface *iface = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> >>
>> >> - /* Enable TWI */
>> >> - write_CONTROL(iface, read_CONTROL(iface) | TWI_ENA);
>> >> - SSYNC();
>> >> + int rc = request_irq(iface->irq, bfin_twi_interrupt_entry,
>> >> + IRQF_DISABLED, pdev->name, iface);
>> >> + if (rc) {
>> >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get IRQ %d !\n",
iface->irq);
>> >> + return -ENODEV;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + /* Resume TWI interface clock as specified */
>> >> + write_CLKDIV(iface, iface->saved_clkdiv);
>> >> +
>> >> + /* Resume TWI */
>> >> + write_CONTROL(iface, iface->saved_control);
>> >>
>> >> return 0;
>> >> }
>> >> --
>> >> 1.5.6
>> >
>> > if removing the SSYNC() call is ok, then I'll queue this into
>> > my tree which I will be requesting a pull asap.
>
>ok, this is in my queue, unless anyone objects then it'll be pushed
>out later today.
Removing this SSYNC is absolutely safe. There are potentially many other
ones that can be removed too.
Michael
>
>--
>Ben
>
>Q: What's a light-year?
>A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
More information about the i2c
mailing list