eeprom driver

Mark D. Studebaker mds at paradyne.com
Sat Feb 16 17:45:08 CET 2002


I made the naming change you suggested in eeprom.c
and fixed decode-dimms and decode-xeon,
unfortunately I don't have a Perl book at home
so I need your help to fix decode-vaio, if you
would please send me a patch that would be great.
thanks
mds

Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> > I think all three we could use if you would like to submit patches.
> I will.
> 
> > On 1), what I kept meaning to do but never did, can you rename the
> > /proc names from "0-15", for example, to "00" or "00-0F" or "0x00-0x0F"
> > or something similar, so that when you "cat *" at least the results
> > come out in the right alphabetical order?
> > That's bitten me more than once...
> I agree.  It makes things much more complicated for everyone, even if
> "ls -v" can help for this particular point.
> 
> Anyway, I won't modify that unless anyone agrees.  I'm rather new to this
> project and this ain't a decision I can make alone.  If I am the one who
> decides, I would even remove the heading "data" and remove the end
> address, since it can be deduced from the start address.  I would have
> something like that :
> 
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/00
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/10
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/20
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/30
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/40
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/50
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/60
> eeprom-i2c-0-50/70
> 
> Now, I don't know everything about the needs of everyone, so I'd like to
> know what people think about it.  What's sure is that it would require to
> rewite some utils, such as the dimms decoder.
> 
> So, please, everyone let me know if it is a good idea or not.
> 
> (Anyway, it does *note* need to be changed right now.  I can submit my
> patches and wait some time that we all agree if a change in the file names
> is a good thing or not.)
> 
> --
>        /~~       Jean "Khali" Delvare
>   -----\_                        mail: delvare at ensicaen.ismra.fr
>  --------\                http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
> ---=ISMRA/- ____________________________________________________



More information about the lm-sensors mailing list