[CVS PATCH] Sync cvs tree with latest 2.5 bk tree
greg at kroah.com
Mon Apr 28 18:58:26 CEST 2003
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 08:34:33PM -0400, Mark D. Studebaker wrote:
> Since we haven't yet branched lmsensors, we have some things to decide
> before I apply this patch.
> Namely, do we do another 2.4-compatible release.
> I'm in favor of at least one more, because I would like to clear up some
> problems in 2.7.0.
> The problems are really on the i2c side though.
> I just studied up on CVS merging. It appears that you can only merge from
> the branch to the trunk?
> In i2c, 2.4 is the branch and 2.5 is the trunk. I want to get some changes
> the trunk (for example new ID's in i2c-id.h) over to the 2.4 branch before
> do a release from the 2.4 branch.
> Let's decide what we want to do. I just went through 36 tickets covering
> almost 4 weeks.
> Phil? Mark H? others? comments please
Why even worry about a 2.5 and onward version of the CVS tree? Why not
just use CVS for 2.4 and older, and use the in-kernel tree version of
the sensors and i2c code for that stuff?
If not, it's a lot of work to try to keep up with all of the other
changes to the code, and placing it backwards into the cvs tree.
More information about the lm-sensors