[CVS PATCH] Sync cvs tree with latest 2.5 bk tree
greg at kroah.com
Tue Apr 29 01:32:53 CEST 2003
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 07:15:33PM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> * Greg KH <greg at kroah.com> [2003-04-28 09:58:26 -0700]:
> > Why even worry about a 2.5 and onward version of the CVS tree? Why not
> > just use CVS for 2.4 and older, and use the in-kernel tree version of
> > the sensors and i2c code for that stuff?
> Won't we still need to branch lmsensors for userspace?
Yes, lmsensors will need to. But not the kernel code. Sorry, I was
thinking only the kernel code when I wrote that.
More information about the lm-sensors