greg at kroah.com
Wed Aug 27 05:11:06 CEST 2003
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:51:04PM -0400, Mark D. Studebaker wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> >>>I2C_ALGO_MAX, defined in i2c.h, doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
> >>>Same for I2C_DUMMY_MAX. Should we simply remove them?
> >>agreed. apparently these aren't registered in a static table like
> >>drivers are.
> >>BTW if we want to make things better for the foolish people that want
> >>to compile-in every driver we should increase the other xxx_MAX
> >Compiling all sensor chip drivers into the kernel is BAD. Do we want to
> >help people doing a BAD thing?
> I think that's what Greg was advocating...
I was? Hm, don't remember that, I was trying to fix a real problem that
some users had, which was solved by the link order change.
But how about removing the static arrays all together. That's what 2.6
More information about the lm-sensors