[PATCH] New driver-id for radeon-i2c
greg at kroah.com
Fri Aug 29 19:16:19 CEST 2003
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:47:51PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 06:58:47PM +0200, Kronos wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > I forgot to cc you when I sent the radeonfb-i2c patch to fbdev. I
> > > need a new driver-id:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.vanilla/include/linux/i2c-id.h Tue Jul 15 14:27:55
> > > 2003+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/i2c-id.h Wed Aug 20 19:22:58 2003
> > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@
> > > #define I2C_DRIVERID_24LC32A 51 /* Microchip 24LC32A 32k EEPROM */
> > > #define I2C_DRIVERID_STM41T00 52 /* real time clock */
> > > #define I2C_DRIVERID_UDA1342 53 /* UDA1342 audio codec */
> > > +#define I2C_DRIVERID_RADEON 54 /* I2C bus on Radeon boards */
> > Thanks, I've given you the id of 55, as someone else is already using
> > 54. I'll send the patch on to Linus in a few days.
> Hey, wait a minute. *We* (the LM Sensors group) are the authority for
> giving the IDs. And we gave 54 for Radeon. Whoever else is using 54 has
> no right to do so. So, please use 54 for Radeon in 2.6 too, and ask the
> other person to contact us to get an ID (which will probably be 55).
Ah, the joys of trying to control a codebase that is out of your control :)
It looks like the big zoran driver update that went into the 2.6 kernel
tree added an id for number 54:
#define I2C_DRIVERID_ADV7170 54 /* video encoder */
As that driver also has 3 other ids, I guess they got there first.
I've cced the person who sent in the patch to Linus for this driver.
Personally, I think we should just make the Radeon #55 as I've done in
the 2.6 tree and move on, we all have better things to do with our
More information about the lm-sensors