i2c bit bashing adapter number allocation (fwd)
Mark D. Studebaker
mds at paradyne.com
Mon Feb 17 01:36:39 CET 2003
I checked your ID into i2c CVS.
It will eventually get submitted to the kernel or feel free to include it in one of your patches.
Frodo Looijaard wrote:
> Cam Mayor wrote:
>>From cmayor at iders.ca Wed Jan 29 01:25:05 2003
> Received: by morannon.frodo.local (8.11.3/8.11.3) id h0T0P4q01958 ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:25:05 +0100
> Return-Path: <cmayor at iders.ca>
> Received: from pop3.dds.nl [188.8.131.52]
> by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.0)
> for frodo at localhost (single-drop); Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:25:05 +0100 (CET)
> Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 15017 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 00:15:40 -0000
> Received: from h24-66-20-25.wp.shawcable.net (HELO iders01.iders.ca) ([184.108.40.206]) (envelope-sender <cmayor at iders.ca>)
> by dds.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
> for <frodol at dds.nl>; 29 Jan 2003 00:15:40 -0000
> Received: from kilauea.iders.ca (kilauea.iders.ca [220.127.116.11])
> by iders01.iders.ca (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-8) with SMTP id h0T0FM7d029699;
> Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:15:22 -0600
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> From: Cam Mayor <cmayor at iders.ca>
> Organization: Iders Engineering Inc
> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>, simon at tk.uni-linz.ac.at,
> frodol at dds.nl
> Subject: Re: i2c bit bashing adapter number allocation
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:15:22 -0600
> X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
> Cc: arm-linux-kernel <linux-arm-kernel at lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
> References: <03012817221704.02271 at kilauea.iders.ca> <20030128233456.F16065 at flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
> In-Reply-To: <20030128233456.F16065 at flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-Id: <03012818152206.02271 at kilauea.iders.ca>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Loop-Procmail: PreventLoop
> After lots of digging, I found a lead to the answer to where to find an
> answer in the place i should have looked but didn't remember - the
> MAINTAINERS file.
> Simon, Frodo, do you have an opinion on where i should submit the following:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2003 17:34, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:22:17PM -0600, Cam Mayor wrote:
>>>In the file ./include/linux/i2c-id.h
>>>there is a list of bit-algorithm adapters and their associated sequential
>>> #define I2C_HW_B_OMAHA 0x14 /* Omaha I2C interface
>>>Are the numbers allocated in a first-come-first-serve (or
>>>first-to-propagate-patch-gets-it), or are they allocated in a more
>>>bureaucratic way? I see nothing listed in ./Documentation/i2c about
>>>this, and i wish to add our hardware to the list.
>>I have no idea; there appears to be no documented method for these IDs.
> I suspect this device will only be used for ARM linux, as it is bit-bashed
> from an ARM processor. However, i don't want to have to continually be
> patching the device number.
> Russell, it looks like at least two of these allocations are present in the
> 2.4.19-rmk5 patch, so perhaps i should just submit this patch to you.
> I've added the two I2C maintainers to the mail to see if they have an opinion
> on whether i should submit the one-line patch to them or to submit it with
> the rest of the i2c code that i'm going to submit to the -rmk tree.
More information about the lm-sensors