failure notice

MAILER-DAEMON at apocalypse.mvista.com MAILER-DAEMON at apocalypse.mvista.com
Sun Jul 13 09:53:44 CEST 2003


Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apocalypse.mvista.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<davis_g at av.mvista.com>:
Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,
it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <lm78 at Stimpy.netroedge.com>
Received: (qmail 5545 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2003 07:53:39 -0000
Delivered-To: davis_g at mvista.com
Received: (qmail 5523 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2003 07:53:39 -0000
Received: from stimpy.netroedge.com (206.228.191.3)
  by apocalypse.mvista.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2003 07:53:38 -0000
Received: from Stimpy.netroedge.com (IDENT:lm78 at localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by Stimpy.netroedge.com (8.12.8p1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h6D7rbBI031143;
	Sun, 13 Jul 2003 00:53:37 -0700
Received: (from lm78 at localhost)
	by Stimpy.netroedge.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h6D7rWNb031130;
	Sun, 13 Jul 2003 00:53:32 -0700
Received: from mallaury.noc.nerim.net (smtp-100-sunday.noc.nerim.net
	[62.4.17.100])h6D7rTBI031117
	for <sensors at Stimpy.netroedge.com>; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 00:53:30 -0700
Received: from arrakis.delvare (delvare.adsl.nerim.net [62.212.110.94])
	by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id B9EE262D07; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 09:52:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 09:53:02 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org>
To: "Jim Gifford" <jim at jg555.com>
Cc: sensors at Stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: Dell Poweredge
Message-Id: <20030713095302.7dc92320.khali at linux-fr.org>
In-Reply-To: <022d01c348e1$8df68250$3400a8c0 at W2RZ8L4S02>
References: <022d01c348e1$8df68250$3400a8c0 at W2RZ8L4S02>
Reply-To: sensors at Stimpy.netroedge.com
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-sensors-spam: ham; 0.00
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_01,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)


> I have a Dell Poweredge 4200 with 2 LM87 chips. I didn't see any
> information on this particular scenario except that dell was working
> on it. Obviously they haven't, are there any plans to try to get these
> to work with lm_sensors??

Well, we have a driver for the LM87, so I'd expect lm_sensors to work.
What is the problem?

> If a motherboard is needed or access to one of these computers, I have
> a dead motherboard and a live system online that I would be willing to
> allow access to.

What do you mean with "dead"? If we can't build a minimal system with it
and boot it, it's almost useless I guess.

-- 
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/



More information about the lm-sensors mailing list