lm_sensors && Asus ASB100
khali at linux-fr.org
Fri Jul 18 14:35:05 CEST 2003
> > Why not. The first step IMHO would be to have a separated prefix for
> > the asb100. It is currently handled as an as99127f. Then we could
> > see what can be done to support the asb100 better.
> The total of our support for ASB100 right now is to pretend that it's
> an as99127f. If we're going to do more than that, my vote is to put
> it into a different file altogether. Rationale...
Agreed. And as99127f support could even go into the new driver.
> > One of our users, Bryan Almeda, already made some work in this
> > direction. His work is avilable there:
> > http://tynian.net/asb100/
> > Please test his patch and tell us how it works for you.
> .. it breaks as99127f, as he mentioned. Also, w83781d doesn't really
> want to support yet another unique sensor chip.
> (BTW, I haven't looked at the patch yet.)
I never intended to apply the patch to our sources. I just wanted to
know how it was working on the ASB100.
More information about the lm-sensors