2.6 - sysfs sensor nameing inconsistency
arvidjaar at mail.ru
Sun Nov 2 19:50:48 CET 2003
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 02:29, Greg KH wrote:
> Thanks, I've applied this and will send it off to Linus in a bit.
> > it just arbitrarily (re-)names them. "min" is not hysteresis; name is
> > badly chosen.
> Do you have a proposed change to the current
> Documentation/i2c/sysfs-interface document? If you can think of better
> names that make more sense, I'd be glad to change things to make it
it is probably too late now to change sysfs names when some programs already
use it. I'll check sysfs-interface, thank you for pointer.
> > > > 4. I do not have the slightest idea how ISA adapters look like in
> > > > sysfs and where they are located. Anyone can give me example?
> > >
> > > They show up on the legacy bus:
> > >
> > > $ tree /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1/
> > > /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1/
> > >
> > > |-- device -> ../../../devices/legacy/i2c-1
> > This does not help much. Libsensors expects as adapter identification
> > either "i2c-N" or "isa". If I set it to "isa" I do not have any way to
> > determine sysfs path except by rescanning /sys/class/i2c-adapter every
> > time. Having /sys/class/i2-adapter/isa/... would be better, apparently it
> > is assumed that only one such adapter can exist.
> No, we internally do not differentiate between isa and non-isa adapters,
> so why should we force that on the user? They work the same as far as
> users notice, and now we are consistant in our naming.
Well, I just tried to match what users get out of libsensors on 2.4. The
reason was compatibility with /etc/sensors.conf where "isa" can possibly be
used as part of chip name. But I'd like that someone from sensors developers
comment on this.
thank you for your comments.
More information about the lm-sensors