lm_sensors current CVS on 2.6.0-test10

[Wayne Whitney]

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Jean Delvare wrote:

> I could reproduce the bug and fix. It was caused by sysfs algorithm
> labels being filled statically, while the same labels are dynamically
> allocated with procfs. Calling free on the labels would crash sensors in
> the first case, of course.
>
> You can check an up-to-date version from CVS, should work :)

Yes, that does the trick!

Thanks, Wayne