Drivers web pages

Mark Studebaker mds4 at
Sun Jan 11 23:59:31 CET 2004

sounds fine to me

Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi all,
> Wouldn't make it sense to add a column "first in Linux 2.X.Y" to our
> drivers web pages? Most users now won't really care about versions of
> lm_sensors (as far as drivers are concerned; user-space is a completely
> different matter), but will be interested in linux versions.
> OTOH, I wonder if the "mkpatched" column is worth the place it wastes. I
> don't think people really care, and the same information is easily
> available from mkpatch/FILES. What's more, the fact that a driver is
> mkpatched depends on the version (yeah, I think I remember that I'm the
> one who removed this information, I know). All drivers should be
> mkpatched anyway. I don't see any reason to exclude drivers from
> mkpatch.
> So basically I propose to replace the "mkpatched" column with a "first
> in Linux 2.X.Y" column.

More information about the lm-sensors mailing list