as99127f PWM kinda working
Jean Delvare
khali at linux-fr.org
Sun May 30 22:07:54 CEST 2004
> Sensors-detect tells me I have a rev.1 chip:
> Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.1)'... Success!
> (confidence 8, driver `w83781d'), other addresses: 0x48 0x49
> Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.2)'... Failed!
OK... The one I tested on was rev.2, so both must be the same for PWM.
> i2cdump tells me that the default value for 0x59 is 0x8f (without
> having touched it since bootup)
I *think* I remember it waas 0x9f for me.
> BTW, I didn't mention 0x83 before, it's just an intermediate value,
> say 70% speed.
You *did* mention it actually.
> My real name is Héctor, I had my new accounts half set-up still and
> that's why you got that From: name. I'll be sending email from this
> account from now on. I don't like my nick on things like this, it
> makes me feel that people are going to think that I'm afraid to say my
> name or something heh heh.
No problem, I prefer it that way too. I've updated the file.
> Please tell me your results with these and other values, so we can
> make some tests to find out what exactly does what.
My own as99127f is a rev.1 and PWM doesn't seem to be wired on my board.
The successful tests were on another board which doesn't belong to me
and to which I have no access anymore, sorry.
In any case I'm not really motivated to work on undocumented chips
anymore. There's more than enough work on documented ones...
Thanks.
--
Jean Delvare
http://khali.linux-fr.org/
More information about the lm-sensors
mailing list