i801 bus problems
ovis at thecourtofeden.org
Fri Sep 3 18:36:47 CEST 2004
Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at d800
V1.5: +1.51 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +3.32 V)
VCore: +1.30 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +2.99 V)
V3.3: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.38 V)
V5: +5.10 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +6.64 V)
V12: +12.00 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +15.94 V)
CPU_Fan: 2186 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
CPU: +47 C (low = -127 C, high = +127 C)
Board: +38 C (low = -127 C, high = +127 C)
Remote: +37 C (low = -127 C, high = +127 C)
vid: +1.850 V (VRM Version 9.1)
modprobe lm85 force=0,0x2e
together with mounting /sys
All my servers i made with 2.6.x only my workstation was upgraded from
2.4.x to 2.6.x so i never missed /sys until today ;)
this is great many thanks
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Confirmed SMSC EMC6D103 !!!!
> > on a photo of the mobo on the web there was a
> > ADM1027
> Since both chips are compatible, I guess intel use whatever they have at hand
> at the moment.
> Anyway the story is quiet easy to understand now.
> 1* The "no response" errors in the logs are for the other possible addresses
> of LM85-compatible chips (0x2c and 0x2d). That's not what your chip uses so
> the bus cannot read from these addresses. Nothing wrong.
> 2* The lm85 driver in Linux 2.6 doesn't support SMSC chips, although the 2.4
> driver does. Using force=0,0x2e should work in the meantime. The original post
> suggests you tried and it didn't, but the log right after that says "found
> normal i2c entry for adapter 0, addr 2e" so I doubt it worked, you must have
> missed something. Just try again.
> At some time, the SMSC support should be ported from the 2.4 driver, and
> extended to the 103 and maybe 102 as well if they are compatible (and they
> seem to be but I don't know the LM85 family that good).
> Jean Delvare
More information about the lm-sensors