RFC: vid scaling does not belong in kernel?
grant_nospam at dodo.com.au
Tue Apr 5 13:24:26 CEST 2005
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:09:39 +0200 (CEST), "Jean Delvare" <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
>Hi Philip, Grant,
>> But the code that exists in the kernel sensor drivers today, checks the
>> CPU, verifies which VRM standard applies to that rev of CPU and then
>> produces the correct VID to voltage mapping automatically.
>I would like to insist on this. The fact that vrm is writable is a legacy
>of the past. There is no more reason to set the vrm value now that
>Rudolf Marek added auto-detection stuff (which BTW should be ported back
>to lm_sensors CVS).
>Even exporting the VRM version to user-space makes little sense now. This
>now only serves for debugging, but this would be more efficient to
>simply print the VRM value in the logs at the moment we detect it.
That's one knocked over then, glad I asked before coding, just need to
fix the odd-one-out: adm1026, to match the others then. Much less work.
So I don't have vrm, therfore I don't need to scale vid, that's the
logical reduction I've been trying to reach. Why am I scaling a value
when nothing can write access vrm?
Yeah, I'm missing something, too late, localtime...
More information about the lm-sensors