[PATCH] ds1337 1/4

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:17:58AM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:18:39PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Jean's point is that you should send an individual patch for each type
> > of individual change.  It's ok to say "patch 3 requires you to have
> > applied patches 1 and 2" and so on.  Please split this up better.
> 
> Here it is...
> 
> Use i2c_transfer to send message, so we get proper bus locking.

Oops, you forgot to add a Signed-off-by: line for every patch, as per
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.  Care to redo them?

thanks,

greg k-h