Sensors detected, modules load, but nothing reported in sensors
Jean Delvare
khali at linux-fr.org
Fri Apr 8 21:51:27 CEST 2005
Hi Jeffery,
> In that range /proc/ioports shows:
>
> 0295-0296 : pnp 00:09
>
> Recompiled as you recommended with ACPI PnP turned off, and it works!
>
> Thanks so much for the response, I am quite happy with how well this
> works!
So you have this same problem as reported on bugzilla. Feel free to add
a comment there, stating you have the same problem. I would like to see
the problem resolved.
> FYI, and I think this may be a bug in sensors related only to dual cpu
> systems (or maybe just MY system)... when I run sensors I get:
>
> w83627thf-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> VCore: +1.53 V (min = +0.94 V, max = +0.96 V)
> +12V: +5.65 V (min = +10.82 V, max = +13.19 V)
> +3.3V: +3.33 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.47 V)
> +5V: +4.99 V (min = +4.75 V, max = +5.25 V)
> -12V: -14.91 V (min = -10.80 V, max = -13.18 V)
> V5SB: +5.00 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V)
> VBat: +0.16 V (min = +2.40 V, max = +3.60 V)
> fan1: 0 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2)
> CPU Fan: 4963 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2)
> fan3: 4927 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2)
> M/B Temp: +25 C (high = +37 C, hyst = +0 C) sensor =
> thermistor
> CPU Temp: +21.5 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = diode
> temp3: +19.5 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = diode
> vid: +0.275 V (VRM Version 9.0)
> alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
> beep_enable:
> Sound alarm disabled
>
>
> Here are the (very minor!!) issues with the above:
>
> 1. When I run gkrellm2, it correctly recognizes that I have two Vcore
> Vcore1 and Vcore2. Sensors only reports the first as Vcore.
Quite possibly in1 is VCore2. Edit /etc/sensors.conf, look for the
w83627thf-* section, and edit the labels as:
label in0 "VCore1"
label in1 "VCore2"
And comment out the "compute in1" line.
Might do the trick. More generally I invite you to search for hardware
monitoring data in the BIOS setup screens at boot time, write down
everything, and tweak /etc/sensors.conf accordingly. I usually helps.
> 2. Similarly, I think that sensors is missing that temp3 is really
> CPU1 temp.
I doubt that. 19.5 degrees is not much. I never saw a CPU running below
24 degrees - and it wasn't an Opteron. If Opertons can really run that
low, I'm going to buy one.
> 3. Strangely, sensors reports +5v on my 12V line, and -14 volts on
> the -12V line. In contrast, gkrellm2 only sees one line - the +12V
> line and shows it as 0 which is maybe more likely since it is possible
> the 12V line is unused?
Unused, no. Unmonitored, quite possibly.
> I seem to recall that the 12V line is used in
> P4 systems, and to support power hungry AGP/PCI-E cards, neither of
> which exist in my micro dual opteron setup. Anyway why does sensor
> report 14volts vs. 0 for gkrellm2? I had thought gkrellm2 just read
> from lm_sensors, but maybe I am wrong about that. Thoughts, if any?
Gkrellm and sensors share the drivers, but sensors relies on libsensors
and sensors.conf, while gkrellm does its own confiugration stuff. This
explains the differences.
--
Jean Delvare
More information about the lm-sensors
mailing list