RFC: test results for adm9240 auto fan clock divider
Grant Coady
grant_lkml at dodo.com.au
Mon Apr 18 23:54:06 CEST 2005
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:16:18 +0200, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
>Hi Grant,
>
>
>> Requirements:
>
>Agreed on everything, except:
>
>> automatic fan clock divider
>> ````````````````````````````
>> * User sets 0 to fan_min limit
>> - low speed alarm is disabled
>> - fan clock divider not changed
>> - auto fan clock adjuster disabled
>
>Why would we want to disable the auto fan clock adjuster in this case?
We don't, here are some test results after fixing above:
first, full display after installing new adm9240:
peetoo:0-002d$ wy_set_limits
peetoo:0-002d$ ww_adm9240
volt min inp max alarm
Vtt 1367 1510 1628 --
3.3V 3145 3352 3455 --
5V 4766 5182 5234 --
12V 11438 12250 12563 --
-5V -4484 -5124 -5491 --
-12V -10868 -11593 -13145 --
temp inp max hyst alarm
1 29.5 55.0 50.0 --
fan rpm min div alarm
1 1467 1197 8 --
2 0 0 4 --
cpu0_vid: 2000
analog_out: 1235
alarms: 0x0000
ci_alarm: --
Turn up full speed (it has a variable resistor in series with
thermisor to calibrate operating point)
Fan clock divider adjusted down one:
fan rpm min div alarm
1 4018 0 4 --
2 0 0 8 --
Hysteresis, fan clock divider stays at 4:
fan rpm min div alarm
1 1474 0 4 --
2 0 0 8 --
Fan clock adjusted downwards (stuck my finger into the fan :o)
fan rpm min div alarm
1 861 0 8 --
2 0 0 8 --
fan rpm min div alarm
1 0 0 8 --
2 0 0 8 --
All fixed?
Cheers,
Grant
More information about the lm-sensors
mailing list