Error messages on ignored values

Jean Delvare khali at
Fri Feb 4 20:37:38 CET 2005

Hi Michael,

Quoting myself:
> I'll apply your patch, thanks.

On second thought, I think that the patch could be improved a bit:

1* You hide SENSORS_ERR_PROC errors for all channels, but I guess only
some of them can actually be missing with the 2.6 driver?

2* You return the exact same error message for the two possible causes
of failure (sensors_get_label_and_valid failing and sensors_get_feature
failing). Now that you separated the "if" statements, it would be better
to have different error messages.

Care to send an updated patch?

Jean Delvare

More information about the lm-sensors mailing list