Error messages on ignored values
mcarland at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 5 18:40:14 CET 2005
Updated patch attached.
--- Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> Quoting myself:
> > I'll apply your patch, thanks.
> On second thought, I think that the patch could be improved a bit:
> 1* You hide SENSORS_ERR_PROC errors for all channels, but I guess only
> some of them can actually be missing with the 2.6 driver?
> 2* You return the exact same error message for the two possible causes
> of failure (sensors_get_label_and_valid failing and sensors_get_feature
> failing). Now that you separated the "if" statements, it would be better
> to have different error messages.
> Care to send an updated patch?
> Jean Delvare
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 15178 bytes
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20050205/fad4ad68/attachment.obj
More information about the lm-sensors