We will port w83792d.c to linux-2.6

Mark Studebaker mds at mds.gotdns.com
Fri Mar 11 23:56:04 CET 2005


Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Chunaho,
> 
> 
>>It seems that no device is at address 0x58. I attached the
>>/proc/ioports In this mail, please check it.
> 
> 
> 0x58 would be an I2C address, not an I/O address. Also, as I said in an
> earlier post, this would certainly be 0x58 >> 1, i.e. 0x44.
> 

0x58 >> 1 == 44 == 0x2c, not 0x44



More information about the lm-sensors mailing list