RFC adding special interfaces to sysfs?
grant_nospam at dodo.com.au
Wed Mar 16 12:34:41 CET 2005
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:03:04 +0100, you wrote:
>> As far as Chassis Intrusion (CI) goes, I've coerced an unused IN
>> limit for time being as all I need is a write-only trigger event.
>This is no good. We made the interface such that user-space can guess
>what any chip does and how to access it without any chip-specific
>knowledge. If you implement chassis intrusion, please make it a separate
>file with a dedicated, explicit name.
Okay, current plan is to add the chassis_clear sysfs option,
implementation unlikely as pointed out by Mark but documented
in case we go there.
Still need analog output -- two candidates in use plus pwm0
option, just a choice of which way to go, decision can wait
More information about the lm-sensors