[lm-sensors] Re: [PATCH] hwmon : Fix W83627THF VID reading
khali at linux-fr.org
Mon Nov 21 10:39:25 CET 2005
On 2005-11-20, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> * Jean Delvare [2005-11-15 12:16:52 +0200]:
> > While checking the W83627THF datasheet, I noticed that there is an
> > additional GPIO configuration register, CRF5, named "inversion
> > register". Wouldn't it make sense to check the value of this register
> > and make sure all pins supposedly used as VID inputs are not inverted?
> > Mark, can you please confirm that your system which does use GPIO5 for
> > VID would pass that test? Proposed patch attached, comments and testers
> > welcome.
> Your patch does work on my system, but... no, I don't think it means
> anything if the inputs are inverted or not. The BIOS might set the inputs
> to inverted if the VID signals are inverted by hardware... which I would
> not consider to be unusual or unexpected.
I do consider it to be unexpected. The W83627HF cannot invert these pins
as far as I know, so if the W83627THF is supposed to be used as a
replacement for the W83627HF, the GPIO pins shouldn't be inverted.
Additionally, the VID signals are supposed to come directly from the
CPU, and if they do they cannot be inverted.
> Of course, it might just as well leave them *not* inverted *despite* that
> they are inverted in hardware... which suggests a new module option if
> anyone ever discovers such a board.
That would be a different problem (getting the proper value, as opposed
to properly guessing if the pins are used as VID inputs), although the
same reasons I gave above make me doubt this could actually happen.
> BTW: I tested by applying your current quilt stack (up to and including
> the improve-gpio5-test patch) to 2.6.15-rc2.
Great, thanks. I'll probably push upwards a part of it this week so that
it gets a broader testing in -mm.
More information about the lm-sensors