[lm-sensors] [PATCH] W83627EHF driver update

[David Hubbard]

Hi Jean, Rudolf,

On 6/20/06, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
> This initialization doesn't make much sense, it is arbitrary and the
> value will be overwritten on first update anyway. What's the purpose?

The value can't be zero, so I initialized it to 1. This is also a
holdover from emulating 0 (disabled). Let's take it out and test it
that way. What do you think, Rudolf?

David