[lm-sensors] sensord and missing alarms

Jean Delvare khali at linux-fr.org
Tue Nov 21 15:03:17 CET 2006


On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:58:50 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:30:30PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > In general, alarm flags work as intended and applications can use them.
> > Only the W83781D causes trouble, and it's just bad luck that this is
> > the chip you are using. So for the W83781D, yes, comparing the readings
> > with the limit values is better.
> 
> What luck.  Should it be considered a bug that W83781D has alarm
> behavior inconsistent with the rest of the sensors?

I'd say so, yes.

-- 
Jean Delvare



More information about the lm-sensors mailing list