[lm-sensors] Andigilog aSC7621 on Intel 975XBX2 - mostly working
George Joseph (dev)
gtj.devel at peakin.com
Sat Aug 11 22:50:37 CEST 2007
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lm-sensors-bounces at lm-sensors.org
> [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces at lm-sensors.org] On Behalf Of
> Sebastian Flothow
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 12:26 PM
> To: lm-sensors
> Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Andigilog aSC7621 on Intel 975XBX2
> - mostly working
>
> Am 7. Aug 2007 um 03:49 Uhr schrieb George Joseph ((dev)):
> > Hmmm. 2.6.16 is definitely not going to work but 2.6.21
> should compile
> > fine. In fact, I just tried it again on a freshly untarred 2.6.21.6
> > with no errors. If you tried the older driver, make sure it's
> > completely cleaned out. Did the patch apply cleanly?
>
> Yes, I applied it to a freshly untarred 2.6.21.6 as well. There were
> slight offsets, but I think that shouldn't matter:
>
> | magrathea linux-2.6.21.6 # patch -p1 < ../asc76xx-2.6.21.patch
> | patching file Documentation/hwmon/asc76xx
> | patching file drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c
> | patching file drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 153 (offset 11 lines).
> | patching file drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 21 (offset 1 line).
>
> However, I just found that it seems to be caused by my config - if I
> use the default config (except for enabling asc76xx, of course), it
> compiles fine, yet if I use my usual .config I get the error:
>
> | CC [M] drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.o
> | drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c: In function 'asc76xx_detect':
> | drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c:1077: error: 'struct asc76xx_chip' has no
> member named 'smb_addr'
> | make[2]: *** [drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.o] Error 1
> | make[1]: *** [drivers/hwmon] Error 2
> | make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>
> This is lines 54 through 64 of drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c:
>
> | struct asc76xx_chip {
> | char *name;
> | enum chips chip_type;
> | u8 chip_mask;
> | u8 company_reg;
> | u8 company_id;
> | u8 verstep_reg;
> | u8 verstep_id;
> | void (*setup) (struct i2c_client * client);
> | u8 addresses[4];
> | };
>
> No smb_addr there indeed, so it seems one of my config options breaks
> your driver. Any idea what I should look for?
Just send me your config and I'll take a look. Either that or just start turning off things in your config until it works.
>
>
> > I've got some info on C1E and EIST on the XBX2 specifically at
> > http://www.peakin.com/xbx2/index.html
>
> Thanks, useful page. There's just one thing which seems
> unclear to me:
> is Tjmax equal to Tcontrol, or is it even higher (kind of a hard
> limit)?
>
I'm not sure that it's clear to anyone. :)
Intel's documentation is not clear and conflicts itself and comments made by Intel employees.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
>
More information about the lm-sensors
mailing list