[lm-sensors] Handling of fault files in generic print code

[Hans de Goede]

Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:56:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I noticed that currently the temp code prints a faults in the place where 
>> normally an alarm gets printed, and ignores alarms. I mimicked this for the 
>> fault support I added to the fan code.
>>
>> But is this wise, since the reading are bogus when a FAULT is raised, shouldn't 
>> the reading be omitted, just like were omitting the alarm?
> 
> I agree that the current implementation doesn't make much sense and
> can be confusing to the users. The "FAULT" statement should replace the
> (invalid) measured value rather than the ALARM flag.

Done, see 3.0.0 svn

Regards,

Hans