[lm-sensors] [PATCH] sensors-detect: Small W83627EHF comment fix
khali at linux-fr.org
Sat Jan 26 10:03:20 CET 2008
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:20:08 +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 05:40:47PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > We can probably go even further. The w83627ehf driver says that 0x885x
> > corresponds to the W83627EHF and 0x886x corresponds to the W83627EHG.
> > While the datasheet doesn't mention anything like this, it seems to be
> > correct on all chips I (and others) have checked. For example my
> > W83627EHG has ID 0x8868.
> > So we could have 2 entries in sensors-detect, one for the W83627EHF/EF
> > and one for the W83627EHG/EG. It would be more precise, and it also has
> > the advantage that the mask(s) would be narrower. What do you think?
> Yeah, why not. We cannot be 100% sure, but it sounds like a reasonable
> assumption. But I'd add a comment in the script which says that this
> is just an educated guess.
OK. Can you please send a patch doing this?
More information about the lm-sensors