[lm-sensors] ADT7473 and ADT7475
Darrick J. Wong
djwong at us.ibm.com
Fri Nov 13 19:41:57 CET 2009
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Darrick,
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:09:00 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > At the light of all this, I think I'd keep the adt7475 driver and merge
> > > ADT7473 support therein. If anyone can think of good reasons to do it
> > > the other way around, please speak up.
> > Sounds like a good idea to me.
> I'll do that then. When I'm done, I'll ask you to test the result, as I
> presume you have access to a live ADT7473 chip.
> What about attribute pwm_use_point2_pwm_at_crit? It doesn't sound
> terribly useful to me, but OTOH you did implement it in the adt7473
> driver, and writable at that, so maybe you had the need. Do you want me
> to add this feature to the adt7475 driver?
Yes, please. By the way, will there be any attempt to make
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7473 select CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7475 when the transition is
More information about the lm-sensors