[lm-sensors] Creating alarm for fans
Karl Schmidt
karl at xtronics.com
Sun Sep 6 20:28:04 CEST 2009
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:03:40 -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
>> No size specified (using byte-data access)
>> WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and worse!
>> I will probe file /dev/i2c-1, address 0x2e, mode byte
>> Continue? [Y/n] y
>> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
>> 00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ................
>> 20: 64 79 c3 c3 c1 24 1a 17 b2 02 95 02 aa 02 ab 02 dy???$??????????
>> 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5c 89 ..............\?
>> 40: 05 00 00 00 00 4d 00 ff 00 ff 00 ff 00 ff 81 7f ?....M........??
>> 50: 81 7f 81 7f a3 02 58 02 ff ff ff ff 02 02 02 a7 ??????X?....????
>> 60: a7 a7 e0 00 00 00 00 2d 2d 2d 64 64 64 44 40 00 ???....---dddD at .
>> 70: 00 00 00 09 09 09 09 09 09 00 30 00 40 00 00 1c ...??????.0. at ..?
>> 80: 00 a4 00 00 44 2a 86 c3 0d 00 4d 4d 0b 0b 0c 00 .?..D*???.MM???.
>> 90: cc cc cc cc 0c 0c 0c 5a f1 c0 ae 00 ff 00 ff 00 ???????Z???.....
>> a0: 00 00 0c 00 00 00 00 0b 0b fe ff fe ff ff ff ff ..?....???.?....
>> b0: ff 00 00 00 00 00 28 28 0e 0e 2b 2b 00 00 00 00 ......((??++....
>> c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>
> I have just checked the DME1737 datasheet. This chip doesn't have
> real-time status registers but interrupt status registers. In these
> registers, each bit can be enabled or disabled individually. If
> interrupts are globally enabled, this lets the vendor decide which
> events should trigger an interrupt.
>
> The interrupt enable registers are at 0x7E, 0x80 and 0x82. As you can
> see, you have only zeroes in these registers, meaning that all
> interrupts are disabled. This is why you don't see any alarm flag.
> According to the datasheet, this isn't the default value. So this
> suggests your mainboard vendor willingly disabled all the individual
> interrupt bits.
>
> The global interrupt enable flag is also disabled (register 0x7c bit
> 2), which is the default. This makes me wonder why the vendor disabled
> the individual bits, given that they wouldn't trigger any interrupt
> anyway.
Strange - I dug up a new BIOS I can put in the unit - I need to be physically there to do it.. may
be a few days.
>
> Then we may also discuss whether it is desirable to enable individual
> interrupt bits when the rest of the configuration is such that physical
> interrupts will never trigger anyway. If both the global interrupt bit
> and the group enable bits are clear, this should be safe as far as I
> can see. This would let users see the alarm flags even when the BIOS
> disabled them without a good reason. What do you think?
>
> Karl, I suggest that you go check the BIOS options of your system.
> Maybe there are ways to enable or disable an action (such as beeping or
> thermal throttling) on some hardware monitoring events? This might
> explain what we're seeing. If there are such options, please toggle
> them, check whether this gives your alarms in "sensors", and provide a
> new i2c dump for each relevant combination.
>
> If you can't find any such option, and want your alarm flags to raise,
> here is how you can do that on your system:
>
> # modprobe i2c-dev
> # rmmod dme1737
> # i2cset -y 0 0x2e 0x7e 0xec
> # i2cset -y 0 0x2e 0x80 0x7e
> # i2cset -y 0 0x2e 0x82 0x0e
> # modprobe dme1737
>
> This will restore the interrupt bits to what the datasheet lists as
> the default. I expect this to let you see alarm flags on out-of-limits
> conditions again.
>
OK - this is what I did in the mean time - just to test:
---------------------------------
# modprobe i2c-dev
root at kiwi:~# rmmod dme1737
root at kiwi:~# i2cset -y 0 0x2e 0x7e 0xec
No size specified (using byte-data access)
Value 0xec written, readback matched
root at kiwi:~# i2cset -y 0 0x2e 0x80 0x7e
No size specified (using byte-data access)
Value 0x7e written, readback matched
root at kiwi:~# i2cset -y 0 0x2e 0x82 0x0e
No size specified (using byte-data access)
Value 0x0e written, readback matched
root at kiwi:~# modprobe dme1737 ignore=1,0x2e
# sensors
k8temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1: +20.0°C
dme1737-i2c-0-2e
Adapter: SMBus nForce2 adapter at 1c00
in0: +2.61 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +2.00 V) ALARM
in1: +1.43 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +2.99 V)
in2: +3.35 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.38 V)
in3: +5.10 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +6.64 V)
in4: +12.09 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +15.94 V)
in5: +3.30 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.38 V)
in6: +3.00 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.38 V)
fan1: 7826 RPM (min = 8000 RPM)
fan2: 8157 RPM (min = 9000 RPM)
fan3: 7929 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan4: 7894 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
temp1: +36.2°C (low = -127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
temp2: +26.3°C (low = -127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
temp3: +22.9°C (low = -127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
cpu0_vid: +1.550 V
----------------------------------------
I did get the voltage alarm that is set! But sadly still no fan alarms, but you are obviously on the
correct track.
I will the latest BIOS in and retest - In the BIOS change-logs.. I have version 3.00
There are these changes:
* Adjusted CPU temperature readings
* Changed the routing for the SMDC card to IRQ4
* Updated AMD PowerNOW! functionality
http://www.tyan.com/support_download_bios.aspx?model=S.S2865
I bet this will fix things -- will let you know and supply a config with BIOS comments etc..
I will also check that PNPOS is set to off - see if there are any sensor settings etc.. Anyother
BIOS settings to look for ?
Thanks again..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karl Schmidt EMail Karl at xtronics.com
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th Street Ph (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434
42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the lm-sensors
mailing list