[lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] k10temp: temperature sensor for AMD Family 10h/11h CPUs
Clemens Ladisch
clemens at ladisch.de
Fri Jan 15 10:57:58 CET 2010
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:03:29 +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > +temp[1-*]_scale Temperature scale type.
> > + 0: millidegrees Celsius (default if no _scale entry)
> > + 1: relative millidegrees Celsius; see below
> > + 2: millivolts; see below
> > + other values: unknown
>
> Maybe, yes. I am a little worried that older versions of libsensors
> will ignore this attribute. The good thing about this is that users
> will still get some value until they upgrade. The bad thing is that
> they will not know that the value isn't absolute. They are likely to
> get frightened by unexpected values and/or to complain to us about them.
>
> I am wondering if a totally separate channel type wouldn't be
> preferable. The pros and cons would be inverted of course: older
> versions of libsensors would have zero support for that, and all
> applications would have to be updated to support it, but at least the
> meaning of the value would be totally clear. This would come at the
> price of some code duplication both in libsensors and applications
> though.
>
> I guess it basically depends whether we want to consider a thermal
> margin as a "temperature measurement except that it's relative" or as
> something completely separate.
It's different from the millidegree/millivolt issue; millivolts can be
transparently converted by libsensors, while relative values must be
handled/displayed differently by the application. So I think at least
in the libsensors API, relative values should be different.
(In any case, we should add temp#_scale at least for millivolts.)
> Honestly, I've been thinking about this
> for some time now and I simply don't know what we'd rather do :(
The sysfs interface is a somewhat internal interface; I think the main
question is whether old userspace (old libsensors or old apps using a
new libsensors) should be able to see relative values without knowing
that they are relative.
Coretemp and k10temp already exist and show relative values. If we
introduced a new channel for relative values now, we would still have
problems with those drivers, so it might already be too late to avoid
problems for old userspace.
Best regards,
Clemens
More information about the lm-sensors
mailing list