[lm-sensors] [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>

Guenter Roeck guenter.roeck at ericsson.com
Wed Oct 20 20:03:28 CEST 2010


On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:43:43 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:38:35PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > But first of all, I really would like the pr_fmt issue do be sorted
> > > out. I don't like the idea of having to redefine it in every driver,
> > > when it seems easy to avoid that. Joe?
> >
> > Agreed, especially since it doesn't seem to be used in many of the drivers.
> 
> As I understand it, it's used silently by all pr_*() calls.

I don't really understand the resistance to add the module name to the default
pr_fmt in kernel.h, and I really don't like the idea to spread pr_fmt defines
throughout the code instead.

Maybe I am missing something, but to me the result of this cleanup is less clean 
code than before.

What is your take ?

Guenter




More information about the lm-sensors mailing list