[lm-sensors] [?? Probable Spam] Re: IT8772E info and reports

Kazuya kazuya25 at hotmail.fr
Tue Jul 5 13:54:45 CEST 2011


 

 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Jeff Rickman [mailto:jrickman at myamigos.us] 
Envoyé : lundi 4 juillet 2011 19:14
À : Kazuya
Cc : lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org
Objet : [?? Probable Spam] Re: [lm-sensors] IT8772E info and reports

 

Hi,

 

On 7/4/2011 9:33 AM, Kazuya wrote:

> Hello,

> 

> I am a bit stuck currently. I would like to know if you can help me. I 

> would like to access to the temperature of my processor. That what I 

> have already done ..

> 

> If you need more information I can send everything you want.

> 

> My system :

> 

> root at teddy:~# uname -a

> 

> *Linux teddy 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 14 09:42:28 UTC 2011 x86_64

> GNU/Linux***

> 

> Other information :

> 

> Shuttle SH67H3 – i5 2300

> 

> The last version of sensors detect gives :

> 

> root at teddy:~# perl sensors-detect

> 

> *# sensors-detect revision 5981 (2011-07-03 13:57:57 +0200)*

> 

> *# System: Shuttle SH67H3*

> 

> *# Board: Shuttle FH67*

> 

> **

> 

> *This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need*

> 

> *to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe*

> 

> *and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,*

> 

> *unless you know what you're doing.*

> 

> **

> 

> *Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded 

> sensors.*

> 

> *Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): yes*

> 

> *Module cpuid loaded successfully.*

> 

> *Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No*

> 

> *VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No*

> 

> *VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No*

> 

> *AMD K8 thermal sensors... No*

> 

> *AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No*

> 

> *AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No*

> 

> *AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors... No*

> 

> *AMD Family 15h thermal sensors... No*

> 

> *AMD Family 15h power sensors... No*

> 

> *Intel digital thermal sensor... Success!*

> 

> *(driver `coretemp')*

> 

> *Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No*

> 

> *VIA C7 thermal sensor... No*

> 

> *VIA Nano thermal sensor... No*

> 

> **

> 

> *Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to*

> 

> *standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.*

> 

> *Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): yes*

> 

> *Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f*

> 

> *Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No*

> 

> *Trying family `SMSC'... No*

> 

> *Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No*

> 

> *Trying family `ITE'... Yes*

> 

> *Found `ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors' Success!*

> 

> *(address 0xa30, driver `to-be-written')*

> 

> *Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f*

> 

> *Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No*

> 

> *Trying family `SMSC'... No*

> 

> *Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No*

> 

> *Trying family `ITE'... No*

> 

> **

> 

> *Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common 

> interfaces*

> 

> *through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other 

> things.*

> 

> *We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it*

> 

> *there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such*

> 

> *interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI*

> 

> *interfaces? (YES/no): yes*

> 

> *Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0... No*

> 

> *Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8... No*

> 

> **

> 

> *Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O 

> ports.*

> 

> *We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is 

> usually*

> 

> *safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have 

> any*

> 

> *ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (yes/NO): yes*

> 

> *Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No*

> 

> *Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No*

> 

> *Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No*

> 

> *Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No*

> 

> **

> 

> *Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware*

> 

> *monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works*

> 

> *reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause 

> trouble*

> 

> *on some systems.*

> 

> *Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): yes*

> 

> *Using driver `i2c-i801' for device 0000:00:1f.3: Intel Cougar Point 

> (PCH)*

> 

> **

> 

> *Next adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at f040 (i2c-0)*

> 

> *Do you want to scan it? (yes/NO/selectively): yes*

> 

> *Client found at address 0x50*

> 

> *Handled by driver `eeprom' (already loaded), chip type `eeprom'*

> 

> *(note: this is probably NOT a sensor chip!)*

> 

> *Client found at address 0x52*

> 

> *Handled by driver `eeprom' (already loaded), chip type `eeprom'*

> 

> *(note: this is probably NOT a sensor chip!)*

> 

> **

> 

> *Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.*

> 

> *Just press ENTER to continue:*

> 

> **

> 

> *Driver `to-be-written':*

> 

> ** ISA bus, address 0xa30*

> 

> *Chip `ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)*

> 

> **

> 

> *Driver `coretemp':*

> 

> ** Chip `Intel digital thermal sensor' (confidence: 9)*

> 

> **

> 

> *Note: there is no driver for ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors yet.*

> 

> *Check  <http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices>
http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices for updates.*

> 

> **

> 

> *Do you want to overwrite /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (YES/no): yes*

> 

> *Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors*

> 

> *for initialization at boot time.*

> 

> *You should now start the lm_sensors service to load the required*

> 

> *kernel modules.*

> 

> **

> 

> *Unloading cpuid... OK*

> 

> root at teddy:~# modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721

> 

> *FATAL: Error inserting it87

> (/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/hwmon/it87.ko): No such 

> device*

> 

> As you told me I tried modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721

> 

> IT8772E yes LPC (2011-06-10) Found on Foxconn and Shuttle H67 boards. 

> No datasheet yet. One request (Boris Hajduk). Support can probably be 

> added to the it87 driver. Try "modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721" and report.

> 

> Thank you,

> 

> Do not hesitate to ask me any question if you want !

> 

 

What distribution is this?

root at teddy:~# cat /etc/issue

Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l

 

root at teddy:~# cat /etc/debian_version

6.0.2

 

root at teddy:~# uname -a

Linux teddy 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 14 09:42:28 UTC 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux

 

 

What is the output from the 'sensors -v' command? That should display what
version of LM_Sensors is installed and what libsensors library version is
used.

root at teddy:~# sensors -v

sensors version 3.1.2 with libsensors version 3.1.2

 

What is the output from the 'sensors' command? If the necessary drivers have
properly loaded, that command will display various outputs

root at teddy:~# sensors

No sensors found!

Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need.

Try sensors-detect to find out which these are.

 

 

 

The 'it87' module should be present if LM_Sensors is properly installed. 

Also, the 'coretemp' module should be present if LM_Sensors is properly
installed. Did you attempt to "modprobe coretemp" and observe what happened?

root at teddy:~# modprobe coretemp

FATAL: Error inserting coretemp
(/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): No such
device

 

Did you attempt to start the lm_sensors service to load the required
modules? If you tried to start the service, what did you observe?

root at ted:~# service lm-sensors start

Setting sensors limits.

 

root at ted:~# /etc/init.d/lm-sensors start

Setting sensors limits.

 

Thank you

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20110705/ddf6becd/attachment.html>


More information about the lm-sensors mailing list