[lm-sensors] sensors-detect changed screen's vertical rate
numand46 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 3 20:33:58 CEST 2012
> Hi Numan,
Thank you for your concer on this problem and kindness.
> For the records, please also tell us:
> * Which version of sensors-detect you used?
Version that I used is:
> * Did you leave the default answer to every question, or did you ask
> for probing which was disabled by default?
I answered all questions to yes.
> I see you're using the radeon driver on a RV380 chip. Do I understand
> correctly that this is a laptop and the screen you're talking about is
> the laptop's own screen? Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pro V2045, right?
Yes, it is a laptop and I am talking about it's screen. It is a
Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pro V2045.
> It would be great if you could dig your logs for a dump of your EDID _before_ the corruption. The radeon driver logs this
> to /var/log/Xorg.0.log. If you can't find that, it would be great to find another user with the same laptop who could provide > this dump.
Unfortunately, there is no dump of EDID in the Xorg.0.log. My screen
is a SAMSUNG LTN 154X3-L01.
Here is the Xorg.0.log output: http://pastebin.com/7Y2wRWpg
But, fortunately, I found some dump of EDID: http://pastebin.com/HDTG4T2W
There are 3 more of like this and they belong to same monitor, SAMSUNG
LTN 154X3-L01. They have same manufacturer, model, EDID version and
product year. All of this dump of EDID are exactly same.
> First run xrandr --verbose to have the detailed timings for 1280x1023, and then use --newmode with 1023 replaced by > > 800
I took your advice and gave xrandr --newmode "try" 68.9 1280 1296 1544
1408 800 1024 1027 1039 command ( replaced 1023 with 800) Now, it is
better. I mean before this command, I could not see the bottom of
applications if I used them maximized but now I can see a little bit
of bottom of applications.
> I'd be more interested in the output of i2cdetect for each but for now. Also I'm not sure what you were trying to achieve >with:
I thought i2cdump output would be usefull so I added them.
I loaded i2c-dev, eeprom and radeonfb modules than gave i2cdetect,
here is the output: http://pastebin.com/4fK1Y4P9
> I suspect you meant 0x50, not 0x60. Please try that and report. I would also need the (bogus) EDID dump from /var/log
Sorry, here is the result that you wanted:
sudo i2cdump 2 0x50
No size specified (using byte-data access)
Error: Could not set address to 0x50: Device or resource busy
More information about the lm-sensors